Log inskip to content

Archive for the 'AP China' Category

The HK The Umbrella Movement Fights Back

Wednesday, August 17th, 2016

The run-up to the Sept. 4 election for Legislative Council is getting tense, and the governments of both Hong Kong and Beijing are watching with keen interest. For the first time, a crop of fresh-faced candidates who cut their political teeth during the pro-democracy Umbrella Movement in 2014 are hoping to bring to the lawmaking body their battle to emancipate Hong Kong from Beijing’s increasingly authoritarian control.

The activists, most of whom are in their 20s, no longer believe in the promises of the “one country, two systems” principle set out in the Basic Law, Hong Kong’s mini-constitution since Britain handed the territory back to China in 1997. Even after paralyzing major traffic hubs in the city for 79 days in 2014, they failed to obtain any concession to democratize the rules by which the head of Hong Kong’s government, the chief executive, is nominated and elected. They concluded from the experience that democracy is impossible in Hong Kong as long as the territory remains under Chinese sovereignty…

However many paratroopers are allowed to run for LegCo, their emergence has already changed Hong Kong’s political scene. It no longer is a two-way contest between the pro-establishment camp and the pan-democratic camp, both of which endorse some version of the “one country” ideology and, each in its own way, considers itself to be patriotic to the mainland. Hong Kong politics is now a three-way affair, with separatism the new force to be reckoned with.

Read more from the NY Times

China ‘detained 20 over Xi resignation letter’

Wednesday, August 10th, 2016

China detained a total of 20 people following the publication of a letter calling on President Xi Jinping to resign, the BBC has learned.

The letter was posted earlier in March on state-backed website Wujie News.

Although quickly deleted by the authorities, a cached version can still be found online.

One of those held, columnist Jia Jia, appears to have been released, but most of the others are still believed to be in detention.

In most countries, the contents of the letter would be run-of-the-mill political polemic.

Videographic: What does China want?

Wednesday, August 10th, 2016

The Economist offers a 4 minute video response to the question so many of us have…

Chinese Propaganda Turns to Pop-Rap

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2016

The state news agency Xinhua released an animated music video on Wednesday in its latest campaign for the hearts and minds of Chinese citizens.

  1. Comprehensively build a moderately prosperous society
  2. Comprehensively deepen reform
  3. Comprehensively govern the nation according to law
  4. Comprehensively strictly govern the Party

Chinese Officials Vow To Fix Nation’s Crumbling Reeducation System

Sunday, January 31st, 2016

BEIJING—Acknowledging that its current programs are insufficient to meet the needs of a fast-paced, 21st-century population, the Chinese Ministry of Justice held a press conference Friday affirming its commitment to fixing the nation’s crumbling reeducation system.


According to government officials, the steady decline in the quality of reeducation is evidenced by the system’s serious overcrowding, dilapidated correctional facilities, and outdated propaganda materials, which have left a large percentage of China’s political prisoners unprepared for life as obedient citizens.

read on from The Onion 😉

Lecture – The One China Myth: Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong

Tuesday, November 17th, 2015

My lecture outline:

  • Geographical Overview
  • Xinjiang
  • Tibet
  • Hong Kong
  • Conclusions/Discussion

Here is my lecture on the One China Myth.

Economist Says Polyamory Can Solve China’s Gender Imbalance. Chinese Internet Explodes

Wednesday, November 4th, 2015

Could polyamory be the solution to China’s gender imbalance? The New York Times’s Sinosphere blog reports that one economist’s proposal to that effect has become a viral sensation on the Chinese internet.

What’s China gonna do? Better check this music video

Wednesday, October 28th, 2015

After China’s state-run news agency Xinhua posted the music video online overnight, it’s gone viral. A quick listen to the lyrics makes Communist centralized economic planning seem cheery:

Hey have you guys heard about what’s going on in China? / President Xi Jinping’s new style? / Yes! And there’s more! / The Shi San Wu! / The what? / China’s 13th five-year plan! / Yeah! The Shi San Wu! / Oh! / Every five years in China, man, they make a new development plan…

The video raises a lot of questions, like: Why are hippies with guitars and bongo drums atop a VW bus singing about China’s 13th five-year plan?

Or: Why did Xinhua think this would appeal to foreigners?

Or, simply: Why?

Debate: Western Liberal Democracy Would be Wrong For China

Friday, October 23rd, 2015

People everywhere are better off living in liberal democracy: that has been the reigning assumption of the western world. But could it be we’ve got it wrong? If you were one of the world’s billions of poor peasants might you not be better off under a system dedicated to political stability and economic growth – one that has lifted 400 million out of poverty – rather than one preoccupied with human rights, the rule of law, and the chance to vote out unpopular rulers?

So is China better off without democracy? Or is that just the age-old mantra of the tyrant?

Speakers for the motion

Martin JacquesMartin Jacques

Author of When China Rules the World, visiting senior research fellow at the London School of Economics, and visiting professor at Tsinghua University, Beijing

Zhang WeiweiZhang Weiwei

Senior Fellow at the Chunqiu Institute, author of The China Wave: the Rise of a Civilizational State, and former translator to Deng Xiaoping


Speakers against the motion

Anson ChanAnson Chan

Former Chief Secretary of Hong Kong and campaigner for democracy


Jonathan Mirsky

Historian of China, and former China correspondent for The Observer and East Asia editor of The Times

Your Assignment:

Come to class with detailed notes from this debate. Your notes should detail:

  1. The speaker’s arguments
  2. Evidence deployed to substantiate his/her arguments
  3. Rebuttals made to 2 and/or 3 above

Though you may type or write your notes, use this note organizer. Your notes will be collected and assessed.

Watch (or listen to) the entire program; the first 55 minutes is opening speeches, the second 45 minutes is debate and closing remarks.

We will continue the debate over this motion in class. Come to class decided on the motion. But be prepared to argue both sides in class, as I might choose to assign sides.

If you prefer, you can listen to this debate on a mobile device, either in podcast or streaming formats.

Chinese Democracy Isn’t Inevitable

Wednesday, August 5th, 2015

The flaws in China’s political system are obvious. The government doesn’t even make a pretense of holding national elections and punishes those who openly call for multiparty rule. The press is heavily censored and the Internet is blocked. Top leaders are unconstrained by the rule of law. Even more worrisome, repression has been ramped up since Xi Jinping took power in 2012, suggesting that the regime is increasingly worried about its legitimacy.

Some China experts—most recently David Shambaugh of George Washington University—interpret these ominous signs as evidence that the Chinese political system is on the verge of collapse. But such an outcome is highly unlikely in the near future. The Communist Party is firmly in power, its top leader is popular, and no political alternative currently claims widespread support. And what would happen if the Party’s power did indeed crumble? The most likely result, in my view, would be rule by a populist strongman backed by elements of the country’s security and military forces. The new ruler might seek to buttress his legitimacy by launching military adventures abroad. President Xi would look tame by comparison.

Read on to see how well Daniel Bell proves this thesis.  From The Atlantic.