<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Exits China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daniellazar.com/2010/01/13/google-exits-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daniellazar.com/2010/01/13/google-exits-china/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:07:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.daniellazar.com/2010/01/13/google-exits-china/comment-page-1/#comment-20678</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniellazar.com/?p=1961#comment-20678</guid>
		<description>Two things interest me about this story:

1. Google talks openly about the security breach, and in more detail than I would have ever imagined from such a tight-lipped organization. They should have just named the article &quot;The Chinese government is funding cyber espionage against us, and we&#039;re pissed.&quot;

2. It&#039;s likely that they were getting their butts kicked by Baidu (the competing Chinese search engine), and saw this as a grand opportunity, not to bow out gracefully, but to mask the real economic reasons for withdrawing. It&#039;s likely Google would have continued to employ censorship if it was bringing in money hand over fist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things interest me about this story:</p>
<p>1. Google talks openly about the security breach, and in more detail than I would have ever imagined from such a tight-lipped organization. They should have just named the article &#8220;The Chinese government is funding cyber espionage against us, and we&#8217;re pissed.&#8221;</p>
<p>2. It&#8217;s likely that they were getting their butts kicked by Baidu (the competing Chinese search engine), and saw this as a grand opportunity, not to bow out gracefully, but to mask the real economic reasons for withdrawing. It&#8217;s likely Google would have continued to employ censorship if it was bringing in money hand over fist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

